Dental Practice Benchmarks: The Numbers a Healthy Practice Actually Hits

Updated June 2026 9 min read

Every practice owner eventually asks the same quiet question: am I normal? The trade press is full of marketing tactics, but very little of it answers with numbers. Here is what the most credible public data says a healthy general practice actually hits — and, just as important, where the widely-quoted figures are solid and where they're guesswork.

Production: what a practice bills

The most authoritative number in dentistry comes from the ADA Health Policy Institute's Survey of Dental Practice: the average general practitioner billed roughly $942,290 in 2024.1 Specialists run higher (about $1.15M). Of that top line, owner dentists take home around $208,000–$215,000 in net income — a net margin in the low-20s percent.2

Treat these as the gravitational center, not a goal. A solo practice in a rural market and a four-op practice in a metro will sit on opposite sides of that average for perfectly healthy reasons. What matters is the trend line of your own production — and whether you can tie its movement to something you did.

New patients: the number everyone quotes, nobody sources

A transparency note. There is no ADA or government figure for "average new patients per month." Every "20–50 a month" number you'll see online traces back to a software vendor or consultant, not a primary source. We label those as industry estimates — useful for a gut check, not gospel.

What the ADA does publish is a target for the direction: new-patient volume should grow 10–15% per year in a healthy practice.3 That reframes the metric the right way. The absolute count depends entirely on your market, capacity, and how long you've been open; the growth rate is the part you can actually manage.

Case acceptance: the biggest gap between "typical" and "target"

This is where benchmarking gets interesting. Analysis of pooled practice data in Henry Schein One's 2026 Catalyst Index puts the observed average treatment-plan acceptance at about 45%, with the top 10% of practices around 75%.4 Yet the ADA's own recommendation is that 75–80% of presented cases should be accepted.3 In other words, the average practice accepts barely more than half of what "good" looks like.

Treatment-plan acceptance: typical vs. top vs. ADA target

Industry average4 45%
Top 10% of practices4 75%
ADA recommended3 75–80%
Observed averages from Dental Intelligence / Henry Schein One's 2026 Catalyst Index (which skews toward larger groups and DSOs); target from ADA Measuring Practice Success. A few points of acceptance is often worth more than a month of new marketing — see what closing the gap is worth with the Case Acceptance Calculator.

Marketing spend: a sensible range, not a rule

There's no primary source for dental marketing budgets either, but the vendor consensus is consistent enough to use as a guardrail: most practices spend roughly 5–10% of gross revenue on marketing, with mature practices trending toward 3–4% and brand-new practices spending well into the teens in year one (industry estimate). The more useful question isn't how much — it's whether you can attribute what each channel returns. Which brings us to the metric that actually decides whether spending more is smart.

Retention: where the top decile quietly wins

Levin Group's data center, reported in Dental Economics, found the average practice loses 12–15% of its patients each year, while the top 10% of practices lose only 7–8%.5 That gap compounds. A practice that retains an extra eight percent of its base every year is, after a few years, running a structurally larger business on the same marketing budget — because it isn't refilling a leaky bucket.

The one-screen benchmark

Pulling it together — and flagging the source quality of each line so you know what to trust:

MetricTypicalStrongSource quality
Gross billings (GP)~$942KADA HPI (primary)1
Net income margin~22%30%+ADA HPI (primary)2
New-patient growth10–15%/yr15%+ADA target3
Case acceptance~45%75–80%Aggregate data + ADA4
Marketing spend5–10% rev3–5% revIndustry estimate
Annual patient attrition12–15%7–8%Levin Group5
The takeaway: the averages are a mirror, not a finish line. The practices in the top decile aren't winning on one heroic number — they accept more of the treatment they present, lose fewer patients, and grow new patients steadily. The hard part isn't knowing the benchmarks. It's seeing your own numbers against them, every week, without a spreadsheet rebuild — which is exactly what Dasher for Dental is built to do.
Curious where you land? Plug your KPIs into the Dental Practice Benchmark Scorecard for an instant read on how you compare across all six metrics.

Sources & methodology

Figures are drawn from the sources below. Where a metric has no authoritative primary source, it is labeled as an industry estimate in the text. Dasher does not yet publish first-party benchmarks; this analysis aggregates public data.

  1. ADA Health Policy Institute — Survey of Dental Practice / Dental Practice Trends (gross billings, 2024 data)
  2. ADA Health Policy Institute — Trends in Dentists' Income (net income, 2024–2025)
  3. ADA — Measuring Practice Success (recommended KPI targets)
  4. Henry Schein One / Dental Intelligence — 2026 Catalyst Index (observed case acceptance)
  5. Levin Group Data Center, via Dental Economics — 'The Secrets of the Top 10%' (patient attrition, 2020)

Stop benchmarking on memory.

Dasher ties these numbers to your own data — leads, ROI by channel, and revenue — in one report. See if it's a fit.